General · DA 38 · 3.2k visits a month

Publishing on internetchicks.co.uk — metrics, brief and price

internetchicks.co.uk is not a link farm by our measurements — 3.2k monthly visits and a 38 DA score say otherwise — so the question stops being 'is it real' and becomes 'is this slot worth $65 for your site'. The arithmetic below answers that; the editorial judgement is yours.

38DA (our index)
31PA · placement page
46DR · link profile
3.2kest. visits / month
$65per placement
Do-followeditorial link type
Niche
General
Authority band
DA 30-39
Traffic band
3.2k/mo
Cost per 1,000 visits
$20.31
Typical turnaround
7–12 days
Audience language
English
Registered market
the United Kingdom
Value rank in band
510th of 892

Request this placement Open internetchicks.co.uk ↗

DA, DR and traffic come from our own index snapshot (September 2026) and are recalculated when a slot is booked; PA is our internal page-level score for the host's contributor templates, not a third-party metric. Prices are per placement in USD and move with publisher availability. Nothing here is a statement from internetchicks.co.uk or an assurance of rankings — link building improves your inputs, not search engines’ outputs.

The placement

What this slot does and does not do

A 38 DA listing at $65 is the price of an experiment: if the article earns citations, you have found a channel; if not, you have lost one invoice.

General-interest publications are the workhorses of a link profile and the easiest place to overpay. The article shape that works is boringly specific: a problem, the method used, what happened, what it cost. A general title with 3.2k monthly visits survives because it answers questions well, not because it loves contributors, so a piece with nothing verifiable in it gets edited down to a bio link.

Two things the metrics cannot tell you, so we say them plainly: whether the host will still accept a contribution article this month, and whether the section your piece lands in is crawled weekly or monthly. Everything else on this page — 38 DA, 31 PA, 46 DR, 3,200 visits, $65, do-follow — is measured, dated September 2026, and available to you before you commit.

Generalist inventory also varies more than any other kind, which is why the numbers in this brief matter more than the label. A 38 DA domain with 3.2k estimated monthly visits and Do-follow links is a different product from the same DA with a tenth of the traffic, and they are priced too close together in most catalogues.

The index lists this property's editorial links as followed. Availability of a followed link changes with the site's monetisation decisions, so we confirm the tag on the live URL before counting delivery.

In context

internetchicks.co.uk in the numbers, compared with the rest of our index

Two comparisons decide whether internetchicks.co.uk at $65 is a good buy: this listing against the 1,576 other General entries we index, and against the whole 2,000-site index. The gap between those two answers is where a price is either justified or inherited from a rate card nobody revisited.

Metricinternetchicks.co.ukGeneral medianWhole index
Domain Authority383940
PA — our page-level score31—clamped to the host’s DA band
DR — linking profile46—51
Est. monthly visits3.2k5k5.5k
Placement price$65$70$70
Cost per 1,000 visits$20.31$14$10.15
Traffic rank of 2,000 listings#1,259—1 = highest traffic
Price rank of 2,000 listings#1,016—1 = cheapest

Ranked against the 2,000 listings we index, internetchicks.co.uk sits in the top 37% for audience and the top 36% for authority, at $20.31 per thousand monthly visits. Inside the DA 30-39 band (892 listings) that price ranks 510th for value, which is the comparison to use: nobody competes with the whole index, they compete with the sites a buyer would book instead.

internetchicks.co.uk out-ranks 37% of the index on audience size (roughly 58% of the index median) and 36% on authority. The placement costs $20.31 per thousand estimated visits, and mid-priced for a site carrying DA 30-39. Those two figures, not the DA column alone, decide whether $65 is a good trade or just a listed one.

Suitability

Buy it if, skip it if

  • New domains that need a plausible first set of citations before anything ambitious.
  • Thin profiles where diversity matters more than raw authority.
  • Local and service businesses whose market has few specialist publications left.
  • Do not buy this if the page it would sit on is already crowded with five other commercial links — we will usually flag that at the availability check and offer a different section.
  • Do not buy this as part of a burst. 7–12 days is the delivery window for one placement; a month's worth of placements across several hosts is the pattern that works.
Content brief

The article we would pitch to internetchicks.co.uk

Pitch angle: a data note built from something you have measured. That is the shape we take to a General audience, because it is the version the host's own editor has a reason to keep.

  • Name a real author A person with a title and a bio. Anonymous contributions on General sites are the first thing an editor distrusts, and the first thing a reader discounts.
  • Add a heading someone would search A question-style H2 phrased the way the reader phrases it. This is what lets the article rank on its own, which is the difference between a placement that gets crawled weekly and one that gets crawled yearly.
  • Put one link in the body Exactly one, in the sentence where the article needs the source. A second link to your own domain is the most common reason a piece gets rewritten before publication.

Anchor plan for this host

  • if you already have links from similar sites, vary the anchor shape entirely
  • a descriptive anchor that repeats a phrase the article already uses naturally
Pre-order checks

Our pre-order checklist for this host

  • Template stability. Redesigns and CMS migrations kill placements. We check the age of the site's oldest surviving article as a proxy for how long a page there tends to live.
  • Neighbour content on the same section. The twelve articles around yours set the context search engines will use to judge the link. If they are all sponsored posts on unrelated topics, the slot is worth less than the price says.
  • Anchor history. We pull the anchors other sites have bought there. If the last twenty were all money phrases, a brand anchor from you will look natural, which is the rare and useful direction.
  • Link attribute on a live example. Not the pitch, not the rate card: the rel attribute on an outbound link in a real article published this month.
Delivery

What happens after you order

  1. You send the target URL and your angle The page you want the link to point at, the subject, and any author you want credited. Five minutes of input.
  2. We confirm availability on internetchicks.co.uk Publisher slots move week to week, including on 38 DA properties. Nothing is promised until the section and the placement URL are confirmed, and we tell you before you pay if the slot has gone.
  3. You approve the brief and the shortlist Where the host gives a choice of section or existing article, we send options with the numbers that matter: traffic, indexation, neighbours.
  4. The article is drafted and edited for the host Written for internetchicks.co.uk's audience rather than for your keyword, then checked against the site's own style before submission.
  5. The host publishes; we verify the live URL Placement live, correct target, link attribute as recorded, indexable. Only then does the order count as delivered.
  6. You get the report, and the replacement cover starts PDF and CSV with the live URL, anchor, placement date and target page. Twelve-month replacement on the link itself, no ticket required.
Pricing

Cost, and what moves it

If the article you want published needs expert authorship, data or photography, that work is included; if it needs a regulated-industry review, say so early, because it changes the timeline rather than the price.

What comes with this placement

  • 12-month replacement cover: if the link drops, we rebuild it.
  • Link attribute verified on the published page and reported as found.
  • One contextual placement inside an article written for internetchicks.co.uk's audience, not a link directory entry.
  • Anchor and target page exactly as approved in the brief, or the placement is not counted.
FAQ

Questions about a internetchicks.co.uk placement

Not when they are spread out, mixed with brand and URL anchors, and separated by a few months. What reads as bought is a block of exact-match anchors arriving between two crawl dates. We drip placements and vary anchor shapes for exactly this reason; the delivery window on this page (7–12 days) exists because pacing is part of the work.

By the tests we run, no: 3.2k estimated monthly visits, a 38 DA score and 46 DR are not the shape of a network built to sell links, and the site's own publishing activity is visible. What we cannot certify is what happens after our snapshot — a site can be sold, a section can be converted into a link shop, a CMS migration can drop a page. That is why the live URL is re-checked before delivery and why the replacement cover exists.

DA 38 describes the domain. The PA figure here (31) is our own page-level score for the templates that would carry your placement: how deep the site links them, how much of the domain's crawl budget and internal weight reaches them, how old and how referenced they are. A site can hold 38 DA while its contributor template scores 31, and it is the template that your link sits in.

Rebuilt and re-reported, under the same 12-month cover as every placement in the index. Links drop for boring reasons — redesigns, content pruning, a host losing interest in contributor content — and internetchicks.co.uk is no more immune than a 38 DA site usually is. We monitor rather than waiting for you to notice.

Yes — ask and we will send the anchor and target profile for the host's recent contributions. It takes a day and it tells you more about how your placement will look than any metric on this page does.

Mechanically: DA 38 against a median of 39, 3.2k monthly visits against 5k, $65 against a median of $70. That puts this listing 7% below the median on price and below the index median on audience within its own section of the index, which is the only comparison worth making when you are spending $65.

Book this slot, or ask for something closer to your market

Send the URL you want the link to point at and we confirm availability on internetchicks.co.uk before you are invoiced — or we shortlist three comparable listings from the General section of the index instead.

Request this placement Browse all 2,000 site briefs