Technology · DA 35 · 9k visits a month

Publishing on techpp.co.uk — metrics, brief and price

Here is the honest version of the techpp.co.uk listing: 35 DA, 33 PA, 57 DR, 9k visits a month, Do-follow editorial links, $75 per placement, 7–12 days typical turnaround. Then what to write, what to check, and when this is the wrong buy.

35DA (our index)
33PA · placement page
57DR · link profile
9kest. visits / month
$75per placement
Do-followeditorial link type
Niche
Technology
Authority band
DA 30-39
Traffic band
9k/mo
Cost per 1,000 visits
$8.33
Typical turnaround
7–12 days
Audience language
English
Registered market
the United Kingdom
Value rank in band
333rd of 892

Request this placement Open techpp.co.uk ↗

DA, DR and traffic come from our own index snapshot (September 2026) and are recalculated when a slot is booked; PA is our internal page-level score for the host's contributor templates, not a third-party metric. Prices are per placement in USD and move with publisher availability. Nothing here is a statement from techpp.co.uk or an assurance of rankings — link building improves your inputs, not search engines’ outputs.

The placement

What you are buying on techpp.co.uk

Mid-market at $75: the band where judgement about the site matters more than the invoice.

The commercial value here is different from a general blog: a link from a technology title is usually read by people who will mention it somewhere else. That is why an article with a real number in it keeps returning value a year later, while a listicle about trends dies in the archive. Give the editor something they can cite.

Within the Technology section of the index — 53 listings, 41 median DA, 15.5k median traffic, $40 median price — this placement is 88% above the median on cost and about 1.6× the index median on audience. Listings in that section range from $30 at the cheap end, so the question is not whether $75 is high for a link, but whether it is high for this one.

Expect editorial standards to be enforced on the structure as well as the tone: no thin affiliate comparisons, no recycled press copy, links that go somewhere the reader needs rather than somewhere you want. Sites with 9k monthly visits cannot survive publishing filler, so write for their reader first and your anchor second.

Our observation on this host is do-follow outbound links in editorial content. That is the attribute, not the value: the 35 DA and 9k monthly visits are what the attribute is attached to.

In context

Reading techpp.co.uk's metrics against the market

Two comparisons decide whether techpp.co.uk at $75 is a good buy: this listing against the 53 other Technology entries we index, and against the whole 2,000-site index. The gap between those two answers is where a price is either justified or inherited from a rate card nobody revisited.

Metrictechpp.co.ukTechnology medianWhole index
Domain Authority354140
PA — our page-level score33—clamped to the host’s DA band
DR — linking profile57—51
Est. monthly visits9k15.5k5.5k
Placement price$75$40$70
Cost per 1,000 visits$8.33$3.70$10.15
Traffic rank of 2,000 listings#771—1 = highest traffic
Price rank of 2,000 listings#477—1 = cheapest

Ranked against the 2,000 listings we index, techpp.co.uk sits in the top 61% for audience and the top 15% for authority, at $8.33 per thousand monthly visits. Inside the DA 30-39 band (892 listings) that price ranks 333rd for value, which is the comparison to use: nobody competes with the whole index, they compete with the sites a buyer would book instead.

techpp.co.uk out-ranks 61% of the index on audience size (about 1.6× the index median) and 15% on authority. The placement costs $8.33 per thousand estimated visits, and cheaper per visit than 62% of the DA 30-39 band. Those two figures, not the DA column alone, decide whether $75 is a good trade or just a listed one.

Suitability

Buy it if, skip it if

  • Migration and platform pages that compete on comparison terms.
  • Agencies selling technical work who need proof of specialism, not proof of volume.
  • Founders building a personal search presence alongside the company site.
  • Do not buy this if the site's topical distance from your market needs three paragraphs of explanation. Relevance has to be obvious to a crawler reading the neighbourhood.
  • Do not buy this if you need the anchor to be your money keyword and the host is marked Do-follow. Attribute and anchor politics matter less than the page's survival, and a forced anchor is the easiest thing for an editor to change.
Content brief

The content shape that survives this desk

Pitch angle: a tutorial that a reader can finish in an afternoon and verify. That is the shape we take to a Technology audience, because it is the version the host's own editor has a reason to keep.

  • Include one thing nobody else has A table, a chart, a worked example, a photograph you took. This is what earns the citations that make the $75 look cheap a year later.
  • Add a heading someone would search A question-style H2 phrased the way the reader phrases it. This is what lets the article rank on its own, which is the difference between a placement that gets crawled weekly and one that gets crawled yearly.
  • Send the anchor text in the draft Not afterwards. Once the editor has set the copy, changing the anchor is a new request and a new reason for the link to end up in a bio block.

Anchor plan for this host

  • two links maximum, one of them to a reference outside your own domain
  • a product-name anchor only in the bio or a final 'tools mentioned' line
Pre-order checks

Before you order: six checks on techpp.co.uk

  • Anchor history. We pull the anchors other sites have bought there. If the last twenty were all money phrases, a brand anchor from you will look natural, which is the rare and useful direction.
  • Indexation of the host's recent output. We run site:techpp.co.uk and compare the count against the site's publishing rate. A property publishing weekly with a fraction of its pages indexed has a crawl or quality problem you would inherit.
  • Editorial activity. A site with 9k monthly visits and nothing published in six months is a decaying asset, and decaying assets get dropped from the index in batches.
  • Template stability. Redesigns and CMS migrations kill placements. We check the age of the site's oldest surviving article as a proxy for how long a page there tends to live.
Delivery

How the order runs

  1. You send the target URL and your angle The page you want the link to point at, the subject, and any author you want credited. Five minutes of input.
  2. We confirm availability on techpp.co.uk Publisher slots move week to week, including on 35 DA properties. Nothing is promised until the section and the placement URL are confirmed, and we tell you before you pay if the slot has gone.
  3. You approve the brief and the shortlist Where the host gives a choice of section or existing article, we send options with the numbers that matter: traffic, indexation, neighbours.
  4. The article is drafted and edited for the host Written for techpp.co.uk's audience rather than for your keyword, then checked against the site's own style before submission.
  5. The host publishes; we verify the live URL Placement live, correct target, link attribute as recorded, indexable. Only then does the order count as delivered.
  6. You get the report, and the replacement cover starts PDF and CSV with the live URL, anchor, placement date and target page. Twelve-month replacement on the link itself, no ticket required.
Pricing

What the $75 covers

If the article you want published needs expert authorship, data or photography, that work is included; if it needs a regulated-industry review, say so early, because it changes the timeline rather than the price.

What comes with this placement

  • The article itself, drafted to the host's style and edited before submission.
  • 12-month replacement cover: if the link drops, we rebuild it.
  • One contextual placement inside an article written for techpp.co.uk's audience, not a link directory entry.
  • Link attribute verified on the published page and reported as found.
FAQ

Questions about a techpp.co.uk placement

Almost never on the first link. A profile that is heavy in money anchors looks bought, and on a 35 DA site that looks especially obvious because everyone else placing there is doing the same thing. Use the brand or the technique as the anchor, let the article's own wording carry the topic, and put the exact-match anchor on a page you already rank between 5 and 15 for, where it can move without looking conjured.

By the tests we run, no: 9k estimated monthly visits, a 35 DA score and 57 DR are not the shape of a network built to sell links, and the site's own publishing activity is visible. What we cannot certify is what happens after our snapshot — a site can be sold, a section can be converted into a link shop, a CMS migration can drop a page. That is why the live URL is re-checked before delivery and why the replacement cover exists.

DA 35 describes the domain. The PA figure here (33) is our own page-level score for the templates that would carry your placement: how deep the site links them, how much of the domain's crawl budget and internal weight reaches them, how old and how referenced they are. A site can hold 35 DA while its contributor template scores 33, and it is the template that your link sits in.

Rebuilt and re-reported, under the same 12-month cover as every placement in the index. Links drop for boring reasons — redesigns, content pruning, a host losing interest in contributor content — and techpp.co.uk is no more immune than a 35 DA site usually is. We monitor rather than waiting for you to notice.

Mechanically: DA 35 against a median of 41, 9k monthly visits against 15.5k, $75 against a median of $40. That puts this listing 88% above the median on price and well above the index median on audience within its own section of the index, which is the only comparison worth making when you are spending $75.

The index median across all 2,000 listings is $70, so this listing is 88% above the median. Against the Technology median of $40 it is a premium inside its own category. Fair is a function of durability and audience rather than of the average, but if you want to argue about the number, those are the two comparisons worth arguing from.

Book this slot, or ask for something closer to your market

Send the URL you want the link to point at and we confirm availability on techpp.co.uk before you are invoiced — or we shortlist three comparable listings from the Technology section of the index instead.

Request this placement Browse all 2,000 site briefs