$80 is roughly within a few percent of the median against the Lifestyle median of $80 in our index, which is the number worth arguing about.
What makes a lifestyle placement useful is the topical drift it creates around your brand. A yousowood.com audience reading about fitness habits and cooking at home is a wider net than your market, and search engines notice when a brand keeps appearing in that wider conversation. It is a branding move with a link attached, and it should be measured like one.
Within the Lifestyle section of the index — 72 listings, 40 median DA, 19.4k median traffic, $80 median price — this placement is within a few percent of the median on cost and about 2.2× the index median on audience. Listings in that section range from $60 at the cheap end, so the question is not whether $80 is high for a link, but whether it is high for this one.
Lifestyle traffic is broad, low-intent and enormous, and the pages themselves compete on personality rather than depth. For link purposes that has a specific consequence: the article that gets shared, saved and re-cited is the one with a point of view, and the anonymous SEO-flavoured contribution is the one nobody reads. Editors can tell which is which in the first paragraph.
Our observation on this host is do-follow outbound links in editorial content. That is the attribute, not the value: the 42 DA and 12.3k monthly visits are what the attribute is attached to.